Comparative Analysis

Side-by-Side Comparison

Compare key financial metrics, growth rates, and valuation multiples across all four companies to understand their relative positioning.

Revenue Scale (TTM)
Trailing twelve months revenue comparison
Amazon$691.3B
$691.3B
Alphabet~$410B
~$410B
Meta$189.5B
$189.5B
Palantir$3.4B

Insight: Palantir is 1.8% the size of Meta but valued at 30% of Meta's market cap, highlighting extreme valuation disparity.

Revenue Growth Rates (Q3 2025)
Year-over-year revenue growth comparison
Palantir63%
63%
Meta26%
26%
Alphabet16%
16%
Amazon13%
13%

Insight: High growth doesn't justify extreme valuations when scale is tiny. Palantir's 63% growth comes from a $3.4B base vs. Meta's 26% from $189.5B.

Operating Margins
Profitability comparison across companies
Meta40%
40%
Alphabet34%
34%
Palantir33%
33%
Amazon~10%
~10%

Insight: Meta and Alphabet demonstrate exceptional profitability at massive scale. Amazon's lower margin reflects its retail-heavy mix.

Valuation Multiples
P/E and P/S ratios comparison
CompanyP/E RatioP/S Ratio
Palantir292x132x
Amazon40x3.3x
Alphabet27x6.1x
Meta26x7.9x

Insight: Palantir trades at 15-20x the revenue multiple of its peers (132x vs. 3-8x), representing an extreme valuation outlier with no historical precedent.

Key Takeaways
  • Scale: Amazon is by far the largest by revenue ($691B), followed by Alphabet (~$410B) and Meta ($190B). Palantir is tiny at $3.4B.
  • Growth: Palantir has the highest growth (63%) but from a small base. Meta's 26% growth at $190B scale is more impressive.
  • Profitability: Alphabet and Meta lead with 34-40% operating margins. Palantir's 33% is strong but at much smaller scale.
  • Valuation: Palantir's 132x revenue and 292x earnings multiples are extreme outliers, creating significant downside risk.
  • Diversification: Amazon has the most balanced business model (retail, cloud, ads), reducing risk compared to advertising-dependent Meta (98%) and Alphabet (72%).